Wednesday, 12 September 2012
Jim Sinegal, Costco CEO & Founder, my personal memories
Watching broadcasts of last week's Democratic Convention, I was surprised and pleased to see a speech by Jim Sinegal that brought back memories of meeting him 20 years ago.
At the time, many of my long suffering clients had been barely tolerant of my constant references to the inevitability of this new business model, the membership warehouse club, entering the UK and undermining the wholesale trade. Eventually in 1992, I rang Costco's home office in Seattle, explained my interest, and asked to speak to someone who might add some insight. I was transferred to CEO Jim Sinegal, who politely asked what I wanted to know....
Despite many years of working in the US, I am still astonished at their ease of access to key business people, especially in the retail trade.
Anyway, the call went well, and Jim said that if I was prepared to come to Seattle, he would give me some time. The following week I was shown into his office for what turned out to be 4.5 hours of the most down-to-earth and practical description of a business start-up I had ever experienced. He outlined his simple philosophy of demonstrable value for money, the need for tight cost-control, an obsession with the numbers, financial KPIs and performance at his finger tips, and how he had set up Costco on these principles. And all of this without a hint of arrogance, simply an obvious pride in achievement.
At lunchtime he offered to drive me to the nearest Costco branch and show me how it worked in practice... As we got into a new state-of-art Mercedes, he explained that his wife had given him the car as a birthday present that morning, and he was obliged to accumulate some appreciative mileage before getting home that evening....
At the Costco branch, Jim wandered around the aisles, exchanging first-name banter with staff and customers alike, quoted rates of sale and profitability of random SKUs and 'specials' and generally illustrated most aspects of his business model by example. I asked if I might take some pics, and was met with a polite refusal, one of their golden rules...
Throughout the session we exchanged views on the contrast with the European retail and wholesale trade, typical 'trading norms' and dynamics, key players and their philosophies and obvious gaps in the market.....
I was left with a firm conviction that Costco would make a big impact on the wholesale market in most countries.....
A week later a small parcel arrived special delivery, containing 50 x 35mm pics covering most aspects of a typical Costco branch which added much colour to my increasingly stark warnings to clients...
One year later, Costco opened in Thurrock....
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
reEpricing while you wait?
The fast-moving Internet pricing games used by airlines and hotels are now moving to online retailing via a new generation of algorithms that are re-pricing products on an hour-by-hour and sometimes minute-by-minute basis.
A goal is to maintain the lowest price-even if only by a penny-so that their products will show up at the top of the search results by shoppers doing price comparisons. The most frequent changes are for consumer electronics, clothing, shoes, jewellery and household staples like detergent and razor blades.
Retailers find that changing prices more frequently can boost sales dramatically, but requires a lot of attention. First they set the software to beat their competitors by a certain percentage. Then they set a floor price below which they will not go.
For consumers, the result is more volatile pricing. Once the low-price vendor for a particular item sells out, rivals selling the same product can immediately lift their prices without fear of being undercut.
In effect, retailer Epricing is making the world's most modern market into the most old-fashioned, taking us all back to the laws of supply and demand, with lessons in pricing that can optimise our more traditional routes to market.....24/7.
A goal is to maintain the lowest price-even if only by a penny-so that their products will show up at the top of the search results by shoppers doing price comparisons. The most frequent changes are for consumer electronics, clothing, shoes, jewellery and household staples like detergent and razor blades.
Retailers find that changing prices more frequently can boost sales dramatically, but requires a lot of attention. First they set the software to beat their competitors by a certain percentage. Then they set a floor price below which they will not go.
For consumers, the result is more volatile pricing. Once the low-price vendor for a particular item sells out, rivals selling the same product can immediately lift their prices without fear of being undercut.
In effect, retailer Epricing is making the world's most modern market into the most old-fashioned, taking us all back to the laws of supply and demand, with lessons in pricing that can optimise our more traditional routes to market.....24/7.
Friday, 7 September 2012
Who Needs Training?
CEO asks Sales Director: "What happens if we invest in developing our people & then they leave us?"
Sales Director: 'What happens if we don't, and they stay?""
Adapted from Sarah Ouakim via Jeremy Blain with thanks
Sales Director: 'What happens if we don't, and they stay?""
Adapted from Sarah Ouakim via Jeremy Blain with thanks
Thursday, 6 September 2012
If Airlines Sold Paint…
Given Ryanair’s imminent bid for Aer Lingus, coupled with many homeowner’s desire to avoid some painting chores by flying away for the weekend, we felt it might be interesting to link airlines and paint with a lesson in pricing for those NAMs that never like to forget the ‘day-job’
Customer: Hi. How much is your paint?
Clerk: Well sir, that depends on a lot of things.
Customer: Can’t you give me an approximate price?
Clerk: Our lowest price is our introductory special at $12 a gallon. After that we have dozens of different prices up to $199.
Customer: What’s the difference in the quality of the paint?
Clerk: Oh, there’s no difference. It’s all exactly the same stuff.
Customer: Well, in that case I’ll take your $12 paint.
Clerk: Well actually the $12 variety is only available on our website. If you want to buy it here at the store you’ll be charged an additional $20 Customer Convenience Fee
Customer: So if I go home and get it off the website, its only $12?
Clerk: That’s correct sir – plus a Credit Card Usage Fee of $6 and then there’s standard Shipping and Handling of $15.
Customer: What? So in other words buying online would cost me almost exactly the same as what I’d have to pay here in the store?
Clerk: I suppose so, but if you buy it here you get to use it immediately. Online purchases take ten business days to get to you – unless you pay the optional $25 Express My Paint Fee.
Customer: You’ve got to be kidding me!
Clerk: Well no sir, but it’s academic anyway as right now the $12 paint is completely sold out in both places.
Customer: That’s BS. I’m looking at shelves full of the stuff!
Clerk: Ah, but that doesn’t mean it’s available for sale. We sell only a certain number of introductory priced cans on any given day. Oops, look at that! It just became available again – at $17.50.
Customer: C’mon! You mean to say it went up while I’m standing here?!
Clerk: ‘Fraid so. Inventory control changes our prices all the time.
I strongly recommend you purchase your paint as soon as possible as it could go up again. How many gallons do you want?
Customer: Well, maybe three gallons. No, make that four, I don’t want to run out. I assume I can return anything I don’t open?
Clerk: Certainly sir. The $12 paint is non-refundable, but if you return it within 48 hours you will be entitled to a $5 credit towards the future purchase of another gallon of the same color at the same or higher price.
Customer: That’s crazy. In that case I’ll just give any unopened cans to my brother as he’s planning to repaint his home soon.
Clerk: Sorry sir, no-can-do! Our terms and CANditions – that’s a little in-house joke – prohibit paint transfer. It is strictly for the use of the original purchaser.
Customer: But wait a minute, I hadn’t spotted those “Paint Sale – $9.99* a Can” signs over there? That sounds like a much better deal.
Clerk: Ah yes, that’s from our low cost paint division. The asterisk denotes that the cans are actually half-gallons and the price is based on a minimum purchase of two. There is also an additional Environmental Fee of $5 per can, a non-refundable Can Deposit of $3.50, a Paint Facility Charge of $5 and if you want more than one color, the second has a $25 surcharge and the third is $50 extra.
Customer: This is utterly ridiculous. To hell with this! I’ll buy what I need somewhere else!
Clerk: Well sir, you may be able to buy paint for some rooms from another store, but you won’t be able to find paint for your connecting hall and stairway anywhere but here. And I should also point out that if you want Uni-Directional paint it is priced at $249 a gallon.
Customer: I thought your most expensive paint was $199!
Clerk: That’s only if you paint non-stop all the way around the room and back to the point at which you started. Stairways and hallways are considered one-way exceptions to the rule.
Customer: So, if I buy the $199 paint and use it in my hallway what are you going to do about it – send some goons in to paint over it?
Clerk: Wow, I believe you’re getting it now sir. But no, please, that would be plain silly. We’ll simply charge you a Direction Adjustment Fee plus the difference to $249 on your next purchase.
Customer: Next purchase? No way! I’m out ‘a here
Clerk: At Skyhigh Paints we never forget you have a choice, so thanks for shopping with us. Have a nice day!
Have a price-sensitive weekend, from the NamNews Team!
Credits: latest version found here
Appears to have originated in Travel Weekly, October 1998, by Alan H. Hess
Supermarkets eroding their brand equity?
Almost three-quarters of consumers believe supermarkets are trying to mislead them with confusing pricing practices, Which? has found.
Their survey of 2,100 shoppers revealed that 74 per cent think supermarkets are trying to dupe them.
Current legislation requires retailers to provide both a selling price and a unit price for products, but a spot-check of branches of each of the 10 leading supermarkets found none met the watchdog's best practice criteria developed with Trading Standards and the Royal National Institute of Blind People for size and legibility of unit pricing.
Deliberate or not?
The key issue is whether retailers are doing it deliberately, in which case nothing will change…
However, if retailers want true like-with-like comparison they need simplify the process for shoppers….
Making price comparison easier
Expressing the shelf-price per 100g/100ml along with the SKU price would surely add clarity to the (deliberate?) confusion caused by random use of Kg/g in shelf-label unit pricing, BOGOFs, extra-value packs, products sold in ‘standard packs & loose’ and especially the use of shrinking-packs to disguise price-rises….
Instead, stores routinely sell fresh fruit and vegetables in standard packs for a fixed price without providing a clear price comparison with the same items sold loose.
Call for legal enforcement
Consumer champions Which? are calling for a change in the law that would require retailers to provide clear unit prices, including shelf labels in large print against a clear background, showing a price based on a standard formula such as pence per item.
Morrisons Act first
A week ago we advocated this approach in KamBlog
Now Morrisons have announced it will introduce standard large labels showing the unit price and price per kilo or per litre across all its products by the end of next year. A pity if other retailers wait that long to follow suit…
Evaluating the real brand of supplier or retailer
Shoppers use price as the final ‘decider’, but we should remember that this is on the assumption that all other things are equal. In other words, by making it clear what the shopper is getting for the money, the ‘per 100’ comparison forces the brand to rely upon Performance, Presentation and Place in a like-with-like Price evaluation with the available competition, causing the shopper-consumer to fall back on the brand equity we have taken so much trouble to build and sustain over the years.
In the old days it used to be called trust…the most precious commodity in any business!
Their survey of 2,100 shoppers revealed that 74 per cent think supermarkets are trying to dupe them.
Current legislation requires retailers to provide both a selling price and a unit price for products, but a spot-check of branches of each of the 10 leading supermarkets found none met the watchdog's best practice criteria developed with Trading Standards and the Royal National Institute of Blind People for size and legibility of unit pricing.
Deliberate or not?
The key issue is whether retailers are doing it deliberately, in which case nothing will change…
However, if retailers want true like-with-like comparison they need simplify the process for shoppers….
Making price comparison easier
Expressing the shelf-price per 100g/100ml along with the SKU price would surely add clarity to the (deliberate?) confusion caused by random use of Kg/g in shelf-label unit pricing, BOGOFs, extra-value packs, products sold in ‘standard packs & loose’ and especially the use of shrinking-packs to disguise price-rises….
Instead, stores routinely sell fresh fruit and vegetables in standard packs for a fixed price without providing a clear price comparison with the same items sold loose.
Call for legal enforcement
Consumer champions Which? are calling for a change in the law that would require retailers to provide clear unit prices, including shelf labels in large print against a clear background, showing a price based on a standard formula such as pence per item.
Morrisons Act first
A week ago we advocated this approach in KamBlog
Now Morrisons have announced it will introduce standard large labels showing the unit price and price per kilo or per litre across all its products by the end of next year. A pity if other retailers wait that long to follow suit…
Evaluating the real brand of supplier or retailer
Shoppers use price as the final ‘decider’, but we should remember that this is on the assumption that all other things are equal. In other words, by making it clear what the shopper is getting for the money, the ‘per 100’ comparison forces the brand to rely upon Performance, Presentation and Place in a like-with-like Price evaluation with the available competition, causing the shopper-consumer to fall back on the brand equity we have taken so much trouble to build and sustain over the years.
In the old days it used to be called trust…the most precious commodity in any business!
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
M&S Flag-ship floor plan - the real priorities?
Click image for larger copy
You have seen the pics, (if not, Google Images Chester Oaks M&S)
You may have even made a storecheck…
Either way a floor-plan of ground and firsl floors layout will help you appreciate the relative importance of Food vs. Non-food, departmental adjacencies and all the other little things that tell you where a retailer is going…
P.S. If you would like a 3MB pdf of the the above floorplan, please email me on bmoore@namnews.com
Tuesday, 4 September 2012
RUSSIA: X5 Retail Head of Hypermarket Division, Jan Fuchs off to opportunities elsewhere…
Russia’s largest retailer has confirmed that it has lost the services of a number of senior managers due to disappointing results. The departures add more pressure on the group, which has seen sales at its hypermarkets fall regularly in the past few quarters.
• With sales declines like these is it any wonder that Jan Fuchs off to opportunities elsewhere…?
• Apologies, I have waited 54 years to use that one, ever since the London Evening Standard carried the headline “Famous explorer Sir Vivian Fuchs off to the North Pole” back in 1958…
• With sales declines like these is it any wonder that Jan Fuchs off to opportunities elsewhere…?
• Apologies, I have waited 54 years to use that one, ever since the London Evening Standard carried the headline “Famous explorer Sir Vivian Fuchs off to the North Pole” back in 1958…
Eye-controlled Gaze TV unveiled in Berlin’s IFA Trade show
Viewers that resisted over-dosing on their Olympics viewing can now revert to potato-mode by avoiding unnecessary exercise caused by having to reach out and press the clicker…
Details + pic at BBC
How it works
Viewers control the set by staring at the top or bottom of the screen to activate a user-interface.
The user can then change the volume, switch channel or carry out other functions by looking at icons shown on the display.
Applications
Apart from TV, the eye-tracking technology originally aimed at helping disabled people control computers. Potential applications include gaze-controlled car information systems, surgery room image display screens, and video games.
New levels of viewer engagement?
Whilst still at prototype stage, Gaze TV’s elimination of the remote-control offers potential for whole new levels of family disagreement, apart from the hazard of high-speed random channel switching caused by a family member nodding off during the boring parts…
It is also a step up from attempts to involve family pets in the viewing process
However, the real issue for advertisers has to be the renewed pressure on maintaining viewer engagement, the need to refine the message to a precise and unique fit with consumer need, linked with a solution that delivers above expectation, better than alternatives available, or else….
Details + pic at BBC
How it works
Viewers control the set by staring at the top or bottom of the screen to activate a user-interface.
The user can then change the volume, switch channel or carry out other functions by looking at icons shown on the display.
Applications
Apart from TV, the eye-tracking technology originally aimed at helping disabled people control computers. Potential applications include gaze-controlled car information systems, surgery room image display screens, and video games.
New levels of viewer engagement?
Whilst still at prototype stage, Gaze TV’s elimination of the remote-control offers potential for whole new levels of family disagreement, apart from the hazard of high-speed random channel switching caused by a family member nodding off during the boring parts…
It is also a step up from attempts to involve family pets in the viewing process
However, the real issue for advertisers has to be the renewed pressure on maintaining viewer engagement, the need to refine the message to a precise and unique fit with consumer need, linked with a solution that delivers above expectation, better than alternatives available, or else….
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)